Film Processing: Does anyone know how I can transfer shots taken with 35mm film into their digital equivilents - professional digital photo processing
Now I have to take and still intend to post pictures with my 35mm SLR and want to be able to manage high-quality digital copies of them on my computer as I do with those taken from my digital camera. Someone knows how can I get it? Because until now I'm just with what I created from the CD image, when the processing film in disgust. Once the film or film processing, or both? If so, what kind of film should I buy for my Canon EOS Rebel Ti 35mm SLR, and how you handle your order will receive movie sucks. I like Wolf Camera, they are the best? Or should I go with a processor professional film?
Sunday, January 3, 2010
Professional Digital Photo Processing Film Processing: Does Anyone Know How I Can Transfer Shots Taken With 35mm Film Into Their Digital Equivilents
1 comment:
The only way to get it right is to be paid either to scanned images, or buy a scanner to have the scanning of slides and scanning for themselves.
I suggest that my scanner and do it yourself, because it gives you more control, and if you intend will search a large number of images much more profitable. I do not know what your budget allows, but now the best balance between price and performance, the Nikon Coolscan 9000, or what they call the latest version of this model. It is the closest thing to buying a commercial scanner, the cost in the 10s of thousands of drums. The Nikon is worth around 2000 and worth every penny.
If your budget is tight then the lower end Nikon film scanners, flat on any surface, not as scanning a plane to the NEG.
The CD's you get when you film contract a waste of time that the resolution is low and in the proper format. In general, the best, no more than 4x6 cm at 300 dpi or less, the fine for small prints, but useless for expansion. TMoreover, they are in jpg format, which is compressed and not ideal for what you do.
I have a scanner again, either s20xi HP, which is not as good as the Nikon, but still better than others. I can scan slides and NEG in 2400ppi trips and TIFF files to give you enough work, but not as good as the Nikon 4000ppi product. A typical color neg / slide will produce a file about 25 MB large, as opposed to that which receives the files of 2 MB on a CD.
Wolf was a little better in the treatment plant, but not much overall. I mean local CVS, but only because I know people in the photo dept well and trust them to be careful when dealing with movies. Most places in the accepted treatment in order to use the same or very similar equipment to the film development and similar results. Wolf tends to be a little better, because the training of their employees a little better, because they are trained to do something, and not as part of general education and goal.
Post a Comment